CINEMATOGRAPHERS ARE CONCERNED ABOUT ISSUE OF OBSERVANCE OF
ARMENIAN TYPE OF FILM
28-12-2006 14:10:00 | Armenia | Culture
YEREVAN, DECEMBER 28, NOYAN TAPAN. An agreement on
cooperation of the Rotterdam, Pusan and Golden Apricot ("Voske
Tsiran") film festivals will be signed within the framework of
the Rotterdam festival in January, 2007. Susanna Haroutiunian,
the Golden Apricot Artistic Director stated about it at the
December 27 press conference at the "Urbat" club. In her words,
the three-year festival won great recognition among famous
festivals and prominent figures of the cinematography of the
world.
In 2006 as well, the festival presented itself with variety
of films, quality and geography. "The spectator also considers
the festival to be his own one. He waits for the festival. The
halls were full this year. The house was even full at some
hours," S.Haroutiunian mentioned.
"We develop step by step and do not satisfy ourselves with
the achieved. In this sense, the started cooperation with
individual directors, producers and festivals is important," the
Artistic Director of the festival assures.
In Susanna Haroutiunian's words, in opposite to low-price
films shown by the television and at the cinemas, the festival
is the best possibility to get acquainted with the alternative
cinematography. Films shown during the festival days bring new
breathing and freshness.
Director Edgar Baghdasarian, present at the
press-conference, who is known to the audience with his "Game"
(Khagh), "Leakage" (Hosk), "Country of Hole Rituals" (Surb
Tseseri Yerkir) and "Mariam" films, finds that one may not speak
about Armenian films "in regard to one year," as the number of
films being shot during a year is too small. In his words, one
must speak about the Armenian film "at least, in regard to 10
years, though little can be said about that term as well."
In E.Baghdasarian's words, state interference is necessary
to keep the type of the Armenian film. In his words, the
National Cinematography Center created on the basis of "Hayfilm"
must develop a policy which will assist keeping of that type of
cinematography.
In the director's words, the Armenian cinematography needs
new breathing and new word: "One must not continuously repeat
that the Armenian film is dead: the one who states about it, is
dead himself. And if some cinematographers are not able to creat
any longer and to shoot a good film, it does not mean that the
Armenian cinematography is dead."