NEW REVELATIONS CONTRADICT TIME'S CLAIMS ON TURKISH DVD
22-11-2005 14:17:00 | USA | Articles and Analyses
By Harut Sassounian
Publisher, The California Courier
The editors of TIME recently apologized for placing a
Turkish denialist DVD in the June 6, 2005 issue of the European
edition of the magazine.
In their apology, the TIME's editors stated that they erred
in accepting the Turkish DVD as a paid insert. They said that
due to their failure to review the DVD, they were not aware that
it contained a "documentary" denying the facts of the Armenian
Genocide. They also said that the DVD presented a distorted view
of history and did not meet its standards for fairness and
accuracy.
TIME repeated its apology twice: once in a letter dated
September 2, 2005 to the Switzerland-Armenia Association, and
the second time in the Oct. 17, 2005 issue of the magazine's
European edition. Here is the full text of TIME's apology:
"We regret distributing the [Turkish] DVD as part of TIME's
European edition and are very sorry for the offense it has
caused. The so-called 'documentary' portion of the DVD presents
a one-sided view of history that does not meet our standards for
fairness and accuracy, and we would not have distributed it had
we been aware of its content. Unfortunately the DVD was not
adequately reviewed by anyone at TIME because it was believed to
be a benign promotion piece. I can assure you that we have
changed our review process and will be much more vigilant in the
future. We apologize to the Armenian community, and to our
readers."
There are three problems with this apology:
1) If the editors were truly apologetic for their error and
sincere in their claim that they were not aware of the content
of the Turkish DVD, why would they now, after knowing its
content, mail copies of the June 6 issue along with the DVD to
those requesting a back copy?
2) Regarding the excuse that the Turkish DVD should not
have been distributed by TIME because it presented a distorted
view of history, why did TIME's European edition then accept to
publish two full-page ads denying the Armenian Genocide in its
August 10, 1987 issue? A similar cast of characters was involved
in both cases: the Turkish Chamber of Commerce was one of the
sponsors of both the 1987 ad and the 2005 DVD.
3) Sinan Aygun, the Chairman of the Ankara Chamber of the
Commerce and the sponsor of the DVD, last week contradicted the
assertion made by TIME's editors that they did not know the
content of the DVD. Aygun told the Turkish media that TIME
executives, despite their denials, were fully aware of the
content of the DVD. Aygun did not hide the fact that his
objective was to influence European public opinion on the
Armenian Genocide, and not to promote tourism in Turkey, as it
was suggested.
Aygun disclosed last week that he had submitted a copy of
the DVD to TIME officials several months in advance of its
eventual distribution by the magazine. He said that after
inspecting the DVD, Luca Rosa, the Director of Advertising for
the magazine, sent him a letter dated Feb. 21, 2005, approving
the DVD (CNN-Turk, Nov. 12, 2005). Reacting strongly to TIME 's
apology and the assertion of its editors that they had no
knowledge of the content of the DVD, Aygun said: "they are
lying" (http://www.Turknorthamerica.com; Nov. 13, 2005).
In an earlier announcement, Aygun made the amazing
disclosure that Turkey's General Chief of Staff had approved the
DVD for distribution through TIME (Vatan newspaper, June 16,
2005). Aygun was forced to make this revelation in order to
defend himself from criticisms made against him in the Turkish
press after the EU Rapporteur for Turkey, Camiel Eurlings, had
said that the DVD would create a negative reaction against
Turkey's EU membership (http://www.atonet.org.tr). Aygun also
revealed that the Turkish Ministry of Culture and Tourism had
prepared the DVD (Sabah newspaper, June 2, 2005) and that a
small group of anonymous businessmen, whom he considered
"heroes," made the DVD possible (http://www.wowturkey.com).
The three revelations outlined above raise serious
questions about the sincerity and credibility of the apology
issued by TIME's editors. In order to set the record straight,
TIME must:
1) Destroy all undistributed copies of the Turkish DVD, so
they cannot be sent out to those asking for a copy of that
particular issue;
2) Disclose all internal documents shedding light on the
approval process for this DVD as well as copies of all contracts
and communication with Aygun;
3) Take disciplinary action against those employees who
either did not review the DVD or reviewed it and subsequently
misled their superiors by feigning ignorance);
4) Agree to disseminate free of charge an objective DVD on
the Armenian Genocide, prepared at the expense of the magazine,
in order to undo the damage caused by the Turkish DVD;
5) Donate the payment it received from the Turkish Chamber
of Commerce to a charitable organization that actively works for
the affirmation of the Armenian Genocide.