TIME'S CHIEF EDITOR CLAIMS MAGAZINE WAS DUPED BY TURKS
03-08-2005 18:55:00 | USA | Articles and Analyses
By Harut Sassounian
Publisher, The California Courier
The June 6, 2005 issue of the European edition of TIME
magazine included a DVD as a paid ad. The DVD had a 70-minute
segment that completely denied and distorted the facts of the
Armenian Genocide. In the same issue, along with the DVD, TIME
ran a four-page ad, placed by the Ankara Chamber of Commerce,
promoting tourism in Turkey.
In an earlier column, I pointed out that the 70-minute
"documentary" was hidden behind several other segments on the
DVD all of which dealt with tourism. This revisionist DVD
created a worldwide uproar against TIME for acting as a conduit
for Turkish distortions.
In response to complaints from many readers, TIME printed
in the June 20, 2005 issue of its European edition the following
letter:
"I was rather disappointed to see a DVD in your magazine
[June 6] accompanying a Turkish ad that portrayed Armenians as
terrorists and the Armenian genocide as a myth. TIME has a good
reputation for unbiased reporting. The DVD is an insult to all
Armenians across the world." The letter was signed by Gagik
Mikaelian, Chicago, Ill.
The editors of TIME added the following note to that
letter: "TIME is an independent newsmagazine and does not
endorse the views of any organization or government. We regret
any offense caused by the advertisements."
Given the gravity of the offense committed by TIME, this
brief letter and the briefer response fell far short of what is
expected, particularly in view of the fact that TIME's European
edition had violated anti-racism and genocide denial laws of
several European countries, besides offending the sensibilities
of its readers.
Simon Maghakyan of Colorado was so offended with TIME's
denialist DVD that he sent a letter of complaint to Norman
Pearlstine, the Editor-in-Chief of TIME, Inc. After receiving no
answer to his several letters, Mr. Maghakyan fired off an angry
e-mail to Mr. Pearlstine, making a parallel between the sending
of the Turkish DVD to distributing Nazi propaganda.
That e-mail got Mr. Pearlstine's attention. He sent the
following reply, making this interesting and important
revelation: "We have, of course, apologized in the magazine for
accepting a DVD whose contents were different from what we had
been led to believe they would be."
Regardless of whether the Editor-in-Chief of TIME is being
honest in his assertion that the magazine's executives were
misled by Turks, such an admission opens the door for Armenians
to ask that TIME now redress the damage it caused by
disseminating the Turkish DVD to 500,000 subscribers in more
than a dozen European countries.
In an earlier column, I suggested that TIME take the
following 6 steps to make up for its grave error:
1) Publish a real apology for disseminating this fraudulent
DVD;
2) Issue a formal memo to all its divisions around the
world not to accept this DVD as an insert (the Ankara Chamber of
Commerce has announced its intention to place the same DVD in
TIME's Asian and Pacific editions);
3) Issue a written warning to all its advertising
executives not to accept any more ads from Turkish entities that
deny the Armenian Genocide (just as they would not run an ad
that denies the Jewish Holocaust and glorifies Hitler; the New
York Times recently rejected an ad from Turkish organizations
denying the Armenian Genocide);
4) Destroy the extra 116,000 copies of this DVD that are
still in TIME's possession;
5) Agree to insert and disseminate free of charge a DVD,
prepared by a reputable research institute, on the Armenian
Genocide;
6) Donate the payment it received from the Turkish Chamber
of Commerce for this ad to an Armenian charity.
After admitting that TIME magazine ran an ad that it
shouldn't have, Mr. Pearlstine must now meet with Armenian
community leaders to discuss the next steps in order to avoid a
costly and embarrassing lawsuit in several European countries
and a loss of subscribers as well as advertisers in the U.S. and
other parts of the world!
ANOTHER CASE OF U.S. DOUBLE STANDARD
For more than 10 years Azerbaijan and Turkey have blockaded
Armenia in violation of congressional resolutions and
international conventions. The Armenian government and the
Armenian American community have repeatedly asked U.S. officials
to pressure the Turks and Azeris to lift their blockade of
Armenia. The American government has turned a deaf ear to these
Armenian requests.
However, when it suits the purposes of the neo-cons who
have hijacked U.S. foreign policy, particularly in the Middle
East, high-ranking Americans officials selectively condemn
certain border closures, even when they are not asked to do so
by the countries involved.
A blatant case of such a double standard occurred last
month, when Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice called for Syria
to open its closed border with Lebanon during her visit to
Beirut.
"We would like to see the day when there are good,
neighborly relations between Syria and Lebanon based on mutual
respect and equality. But good neighbors don't close their
borders to their neighbors and it is a very serious situation on
the Lebanese border where Lebanese trade is being strangled. The
best outcome would be for there to be free flow of commerce
between Syria and Lebanon and we would hope that that would be
restored very, very soon," she said.
The Secretary of State is right in urging Syria to open its
closed border with Lebanon. However, one cannot escape the
unmistakable suspicion that Ms. Rice, rather than caring about
Lebanon's welfare, is hypocritically exploiting that country's
closed border just to bash Syria.
It is curious that while the Lebanese border has been
closed for only a couple of weeks, and Lebanon does have
unfettered access to the Mediterranean Sea, Ms. Rice seems to
have no interest in similarly denouncing Turkey and Azerbaijan
for having blockaded land-locked Armenia for more than a decade!
This is the type of double standard that makes people around the
world resent U.S. foreign policy.