TURKEY BECOMING MORE REPRESSIVE ON THE EVE OF EU ACCESSION
REPORT
05-10-2004 14:00:00 | USA | Articles and Analyses
By Harut Sassounian
Publisher, The California Courier
Several unexpected developments took place in rapid
succession last week on the eve of the European Commission's
critical report, due on October 6, on whether Turkey is finally
ready - after a long wait of 40 years - to begin talks for
admission into the European Union (EU).
Prime Minister Receb Tayyip Erdogan has made the start of
EU accession talks his number one priority. To accomplish this,
he has left no stone unturned. He has made countless lobbying
trips to various European capitals. He has enlisted the help of
the United States to pressure the European countries into making
a favorable decision on Turkey. He has also whipped his party's
parliamentary majority into action at breakneck speed to pass a
large number of laws to comply with EU requirements, even though
most of them have not been implemented.
Just when Erdogan seemed to have all his ducks in order, he
surprised everyone by proposing an unexpected addition to the
Turkish penal code - the criminalization of adultery. He was
severely criticized for that even by his most ardent European
supporters. Making mattes worse, Erdogan then decided to
withdraw the whole penal code from the Turkish parliament's
agenda. Shocked EU officials strongly denounced his actions
warning him that unless the parliament immediately approved the
revamped penal code without the offensive adultery clause,
Turkey would have no chance of getting a date for EU accession
talks.
Erdogan angrily rejected EU's criticism as "interference in
Turkey's internal affairs." He bragged: "We are Turks, and we
will make our own decisions. EU membership is not
indispensable." EU officials did not back down. They told him
that Turkey had to adapt to Europe, rather than the other way
around. Erdogan immediately flew to Brussels and agreed to have
the Turkish parliament hold an emergency session and approve the
new penal code without the adultery clause.
Even though Erdogan was harshly criticized both at home and
abroad for his brash behavior, some analysts believe that he
made a very shrewd move. EU officials were so pleased and
relieved by his backing down on the adultery clause, that they
immediately declared that Turkey had met all the requirements to
have a date set for the start of EU talks. By relenting on the
one issue that he had adamantly sworn that he would not, Erdogan
was able to trick the EU officials by diverting their attention
away from Turkey's many other deficiencies in the fulfillment of
EU requirements.
The EU commissioners turned a blind eye to the
anti-democratic articles found in the new penal code. These
repressive clauses severely restrict the Turkish citizens'
freedom of speech. For example: It is a criminal offense,
punishable by a lengthy jail term, to praise a person who has
committed a crime; to incite hostility against a particular
group of people; to make propaganda for a criminal organization;
to reveal confidential information related to a judicial
inquiry; to insult the president, the parliament, the
government, the courts, the military, the flag, the national
anthem, etc.
The most shocking restriction, however, is included in
article 306 of the new penal code that prescribes a jail term of
up to 10 years for anyone who receives a benefit from a foreign
source to carry out activities against the national interest of
Turkey. The Parliamentary Committee of Justice that had drafted
this clause said that it would be illegal, for example, to call
for the withdrawal of Turkish soldiers from Cyprus or to declare
that the Armenians were actually subjected to "genocide
following World War I."
This article reveals the extent of the Turkish government's
intransigence on the subject of the Armenian Genocide. At this
most critical juncture, when the Turks are supposed to be on
their best behavior on the eve of the release of the EU report
setting a date for accession talks, they brazenly pass a law
making it a crime to speak of the Armenian Genocide! As if this
new draconian law was not enough, Foreign Minister Abdullah Gul
announced last week that his Ministry had set up a committee to
promote the denial of the Armenian Genocide and to counter the
planned commemorative events on the 90th anniversary of the
Armenian Genocide.
All those naive European and Armenian officials, who
mistakenly believe that by joining the EU Turkey would be a more
democratic state, and therefore, more willing to recognize the
Armenian Genocide, now have to explain why Turkey is becoming
less tolerant about freedom of speech and more eager to jail
anyone who dares to speak about the Armenian Genocide! If Turkey
is not willing to recognize the Armenian Genocide at a time when
it is trying to impress the Europeans with its "impeccably
democratic credentials," what incentive would it have for doing
so once it is already a member of the EU? Furthermore, if Turkey
did not become a democratic state decades after joining the
Council of Europe and a becoming signatory to scores of
international treaties and covenants, why would it be more
democratic after joining the EU?
The blame must be equally shared by EU officials who had an
absolute fit over the adultery issue, but did not say one word
against the law that muzzles people from speaking about
genocide. Apparently, Europeans are much more troubled by the
limitations placed on sexual escapades than denying mass murder!
Furthermore, the Turkish leaders, who are fond of saying that
historians and not politicians should deal with the Armenian
Genocide, have now made it impossible for Turkish historians to
objectively study this issue for fear of being locked up!
The European countries should not allow Turkey to join
Europe until it fully complies with all the requirements of the
Copenhagen criteria. This is not an ethnic, religious or
geographic issue. The European Community is a community of
values. Until and unless Turkish society upholds these values,
they have no place in Europe. The mere act of adopting European
laws does not make a country European. The government of Turkey
must fully implement every one of these laws.
Finally, imagine if Germany had refused to acknowledge the
Jewish Holocaust and had passed a law making it a crime to even
talk about it, would it have had a chance to become a member of
the EU? Turkey should be held to no less a standard.
When the Turkish public adopts European values, Turkey
could then qualify to join the community of European nations!