TURKS ATTEMPT TO USE ARMENIANS IN ANTI-GENOCIDE PROPAGANDA
02-06-2004 18:58:00 | USA | Articles and Analyses
By Harut Sassounian
Publisher, The California Courier
After publishing viciously anti-Armenian articles for many
years, some Turkish newspapers have changed their tactics. They
have adopted a more subtle approach in attempting to scuttle the
just demands of the Armenian people. Instead of denying the
Genocide outright, the Turkish press now publishes articles that
urge Armenians to "let bygones be bygones, and to look to the
future, not the past!" In other words, the Turks are advocating
reconciliation without truth or justice.
To make matters worse, the Turkish media from time to time
publishes interviews with some Armenians who reportedly make
conciliatory statements which are presented as evidence that not
all Armenians are "hung up" on the recognition of the Genocide.
For example, in the May 25th issue of the Turkish Daily
News, Burak Bekdil, after a recent visit to Armenia, published a
lengthy commentary titled, "Why Turks and Armenians must
eventually shake hands." Using deceptively accommodating
language, Bekdil distorts the facts of the Armenian Genocide and
tries to undermine the Armenian demands.
He starts his article by calling the Genocide Memorial
Monument in Yerevan "the only symbol in the world that deeply
divides two nations that lived together in peace for centuries."
By feigning to be indignant, Bekdil asks: "how many more
centuries the Turks and Armenians will be living under the huge
symbolic shadow of one monument?"
In one of the most outrageous lies in his column and in a
blatant attempt to pit Armenians and Kurds against each other,
Bekdil shamelessly writes: "The Armenians claim that the Ottoman
Kurds, under orders from the empire in 1915-18, systematically
massacred 1.5 million of their ethnic kin living in eastern
Anatolia." While it is a fact that some Kurds collaborated with
the Turks and carried out deadly raids on Armenian caravans, no
knowledgeable person would claim that the Kurds committed the
Armenian Genocide, while the Turks acted as innocent bystanders.
If that were the case, the Turkish government would have eagerly
recognized "the genocide committed by the Kurds against the
Armenians."
After repeating the standard Turkish lies on the Armenian
Genocide, and accusing Armenians of "systematically killing
hundreds of thousands of Turks," while only "thousands of
Armenians died from cold weather, starvation and disease,"
Bekdil sheds crocodile tears over the fact that "in 2004, there
are two nations, once friends, accusing each other of a genocide
that is said to have taken place 90 years ago and are locked
over the dispute, perhaps forever."
Bekdil seems quite ignorant about the most basic facts of
not only the Armenian Genocide, but of Turkish history.
Otherwise, he would not have asked the following very foolish
question: "Has any Armenian ever been curious enough to know how
many Turks actually lived in eastern Anatolia in 1915-18 and, if
by any chance there were a few, could those few physically have
been capable of massacring 700,000-1.5 million others?" Bekdil
espouses the baseless notion that the Diaspora is dictating to
the Armenian government its hard-line position on the Armenian
Genocide. Armenia "must maintain an extremely delicate balance
between what reality dictates and what its Diaspora sponsors
impose," Bekdil falsely asserts. He then makes several nonsense
statements, such as: "The Armenian mindset is deeply fractured.
Diaspora Armenians think the genocide issue is their 'raison
d'etre.' As for a possible deal with the Turks, they believe
they should represent the entire Armenian population. Are they
not, after all, the ones who financially keep the Armenian state
alive?" Bekdil conveniently forgets that Pres. Kocharian, at his
own initiative, has included the international recognition of
the Armenian Genocide on the foreign policy agenda of the
Republic of Armenia. The Turkish officials are the ones who
reject Armenia's unconditional offer to establish diplomatic
relations, and they keep the border closed in order to force
Armenia's population into abandoning their historic claims.
Bekdil then introduces Nishan Atinizian of Boston -- one of
the major investors in the new Armenia Marriott Hotel -- as
someone who "thinks it would be grossly stupid if Turks and
Armenians lived in hostility forever." The Turkish commentator
then claims that Atinizian thinks, "it is the historians' job to
find out what really happened 90 years ago." It is highly
doubtful that Atinizian would make such a statement. Armenians
know first-hand what happened to them. They need no historians
to tell them what happened in 1915! Such a statement would also
run counter to the fact that Atinizian generously contributes
large sums of money to a major Armenian-American activist
organization that has, as one of its goals, the recognition of
the Armenian Genocide.
Bekdil claims that Atinizian is "fed up" with American
politicians who benefit from "the genocide industry" by getting
campaign contributions from Armenians, "promising to pay [us]
back in genocide memorials." He is quoted as saying, "I don't
care if the Americans or the French recognize the genocide. This
is an issue between Armenians and Turks. What more should I ask
from the Turks if they opened their archives so that Turkish
Armenians could trace their family roots?"
Nishan Atinizian told me this week that most of the
statements attributed to him by Bekdil are false. Atinizian
angrily said he would write to Bekdil demanding a retraction and
an apology. He had a conversation with the Turkish commentator
at the sidewalk cafe in front of Marriott hotel in Yerevan and
discussed mostly the potential benefits of opening the
Turkish-Armenian border.
Bekdil then continues his column and introduces another
Atinizian, David, of Yerevan - no relation to Nishan. The
Turkish commentator presents the following outrageous views as
being those of David's which are supposedly sensible like those
of most "homeland Armenians": "a) injecting hatred into the
minds of generations of Turks and Armenians reflects an archaic
thinking that should have no place in the 21st century; b) the
genocide was masterminded by the Ottomans and carried our by the
Kurds; c) it happened because the Russians had engineered an
Armenian uprising against the Ottoman Empire; d) some 350,000
Turks died as well, as a result of Armenian atrocities in
1915-18; e) the Turkey of today cannot be held responsible for
the genocide; and f) it is totally pointless, against
international law and unrealistic if some Armenians dream of any
part of eastern Anatolia as part of Armenia." Bekdil commends
Nishan and David Atinizian for being "realists." Nishan
Atinizian, who was present during David's conversation with
Bekdil, told me this week that David did not make any of these
statements.
We hope that Nishan and David Atinizian and all other
Armenians learn a very valuable lesson - never agree to talk to
a Turkish journalist, even off the record! Otherwise, when the
article comes out, and distorted statements are published in
your name, you have to do a lot of back peddling to prove that
you did not make the statements attributed to you. The two
Atinizians should take all necessary steps to set the record
straight so that the Armenian community worldwide would not
believe that they said the things the Turkish Daily News claims
they did. The timing of this Turkish commentary is most
unfortunate, as the Atinizians and their business partners are
getting ready to celebrate the grand opening of the Armenia
Marriott Hotel in Yerevan next week. The last thing they need is
a controversial article in the Turkish press claiming that one
of their partners has made such disparaging remarks about the
recognition of the Armenian Genocide.