LONDON, MART 12, NOYAN TAPAN. NOT for the first time,
Armenians sense a moment of vindication in their struggle for
the acknowledgment of the tragedy that befell their forebears
during the first world war. Turkey is angry. And America's
administration is straining to limit the damage. The latest
Turkish-American rift over the Armenian question—after a
congressional committee voted on March 4th to recognise the
killings of 1915 as genocide—looks wider than some previous
ones. It coincides with a general scratchiness between America
and its ally. Turkey is reluctant to slap sanctions on Iran.
Anti-Americanism is running high among Turks. Some suspect that
Barack Obama retains his view (expressed as a senator in 2008)
that “the Armenian genocide is not an allegation…but rather a
widely documented fact.” Still, the chances are that after a
deep sulk, Turkey will send its ambassador back to Washington,
and the administration will persuade legislators to avoid a vote
in the full House, for fear of wrecking an important
relationship—and worsening the fading prospects for
reconciliation between Turkey and Armenia. A tired diplomatic
ritual will play out once again.
Can any actor in this sorry drama do anything to improve
the script? One day a Turkish leader will be statesman enough to
see that national dignity is better served by acknowledging the
sins committed on Anatolian soil than by suppressing debate and
punishing truth-tellers. Such a leader could decouple relations
with Armenia from Ottoman history. (In any case, their argument
today is more about the aftermath of the war over
Nagorno-Karabakh in the 1990s than over 1915.) Some people in
Turkey realise this. As one Turkish columnist has noted, for
Turkey to be so touchy about the minutiae of a congressional
vote betrays weakness, not strength. And nothing would silence
Turkey’s detractors more than a genuine, no-holds-barred effort
to probe the events of 1915. The result of the Armenian
deportations is indisputably and horrifically clear: hundreds of
thousands, probably more than a million, died. But there is room
for scholarly inquiry into the working of the murky state
machinery that led to that outcome—to determine whether the
tragedy was principally the result of murderous design or
culpable neglect. By inviting all scholars to peruse its
archives (something it has done only patchily), Turkey could
disarm its critics.