Defendants on "case of seven" consider that new legislative
amendments contradict current legislation's other provisions
amendments contradict current legislation's other provisions
" />
Defendants on "case of seven" consider that new legislative
amendments contradict current legislation's other provisions
04-03-2009 19:15:00 | Armenia | Politics
YEREVAN, MARCH 4, NOYAN TAPAN. According to the estimation
of the defendants on the so-called "case of the seven," the last
amendments to the legislation contradict other legislative
provisions, therefore they can be used only after parliament's
correcting those contradictions. Defendant, former Foreign
Minister Alexander Arzumanian, in particular, declared this
at the March 4 court sitting. According to him, by the
amendments to the RA Code of Criminal Procedure, the provision of
sending away defendants from the court hall for treating the
court with disregard, hindering court sittings' normal process
or not executing court's orders contradicts the same Code's
article, which stipulates that sides' participation in the court
sittings is compulsory.
A. Arzumanian's lawyer Liparit Simonian on the basis of the
newly appeared circumstanace introduced a regular petition of
self-rejection to judge Mnatskan Martirosian. In particular,
lawyer's petition was based on judge Mnatsakan Martirosian's
2009 February 27 decision, by which on the basis of the
amendments to the RA Code of Criminal Procedure, before the
amendments come in force, the case was passed from Yerevan
Criminal Court to Yerevan Kentron and Nork-Marash communities'
court. The defence side considers that before starting the case
examination the court chairman should have endorsed the case to the
judge and the latter should have made a decision on accepting
the case for examination. L. Simonian consisers that the judge
is interested in the outcome of the case: he considered the case
his ownership appointing himself a presiding judge on the case
and deciding the day of the next court sitting.
Melania Arustamian, the lawyer of defendant, NA deputy
Hakob Hakobian, added that in consideration of the above
mentioned, since making the decision up to the present the
defendants on the case are in illegal imprisonment. The
defendants joined the petition.
The prosecutor side considered the petition groundless.
The court went the consultation room to make a decision
on the petition.