TURKISH-AMERICAN LEADERS HAVE FOUND 'THE PERFECT TIME' TO
SUE EACH OTHER
11-09-2007 16:35:00 | USA | Articles and Analyses
By Harut Sassounian
Publisher, The California Courier
Armenians have always blamed themselves for their lack of
unity. Of course, Jews and other communities, who have their own
internal quarrels, frequently express the wish that they were as
united as Armenians! The recent dispute among Jewish-Americans
regarding the ADL's position on the Armenian Genocide reflects
the natural diversity of opinion in a pluralistic society.
It is therefore not surprising to discover that
Turkish-Americans are just as divided as other ethnic groups. In
the midst of all sorts of political difficulties facing Turks in
Washington and Turkey these days, various officials of the
Assembly of Turkish American Associations (ATAA) have found "the
perfect time" to accuse, attack and sue each other. The ATAA,
headquartered in Washington, D.C., is a coalition of 62 Turkish
organizations in the United States, Canada and Turkey.
The problem first surfaced back in 2003 when there was a
serious dispute among ATAA leaders over the outcome of the
elections for new board members.After a lengthy and acrimonious
flurry of e-mails, the problem was temporarily settled in late
2004. Vural Cengiz was elected President of the Board of
Directors, while Tamer Acikalin was elected Chairman of Board of
Trustees.
Internal disputes flared up again in 2006 and continue to
this day. In a letter sent last month to ATAA members, Tamer
Acikalin, the Chairman of theBoard of Trustees, accused certain
members of ATAA's Board of Directors of running the organization
"like their personal fiefdom" and ignoring all financial
accountability. "Since the current administration's takeover,
ATAA has no budget," said Acikalin. "We do not know where the
ATAA's funds are being spent. The Administration refuses to
become transparent. They provide no minutes. Theykeep no
records=80¦. They presided over two elections and later turned
around and announced these elections to be invalid." Acikalin
and several of his supporters ended up filing a lawsuit against
their own organization's Board of Directors.
Acikalin's sidekick, Vural Cengiz, the former president of
ATAA's Board of Directors, made this internal dispute even more
public on September 3, 2007when he penned an article in the
Turkish Daily News titled, "Why Turkish-Americans are losing the
battle?"
Predicting that the pending resolution on the Armenian
Genocide will be approved by the U.S. Congress, Cengiz blamed
Turkish-Americans for "not fighting as well as they used to." He
stated that the ATAA is "weak, with board members facing
lawsuits now." He revealed that the ATAA's president, Nurten
Ural, who is the Honorary Consul General of Turkey in Detroit,
is "a representative of the Turkish government," and the
president-to-be, Gunay Guvench, is "the lawyer of the Turkish
Embassy."
Two days after Acikalin's letter, on August 19, 2007, Ural,
the President of the Board of Directors of the ATAA, issued a
counter-statement in which she described the lawsuit as
"frivolous and malicious," claiming that it is based on
"unfounded lies, accusations, attacks, and criticism to
intimidate us to follow their unethical ways." She said that due
to this internal dispute, the ATAA "was left with no funds" and
"only one staff member."
In a statement released to ATAA members on August 8, Tunca
Iskir, the Chairman of the ATAA "Advisory Committee," defended
President Ural and severely criticized those who filed the
lawsuit. The Perles Law Firm was retained bythe ATAA Board of
Directors as litigation counsel. Iskir said that "the
lawsuitwill be a costly diversion from the ATAA's important work
in what will be a difficult legislative session on Capitol Hill
for Turkish-American relations starting in September."
Iskir revealed that due to "the current Armenian resolution
in Congress" and several other critical issues, his group had
asked the plaintiffs for a 120-day extension to answer the
complaint. Robert Levin, the plaintiffs' attorney, after
consulting with his clients, reportedly rejected the request.
The Court, however, granted the requested extension and a
response is being filed this month.
Iskir said in his report that the lawsuit will be
financially damaging to the ATAA. He said that "the cost of this
defense could be in the hundreds of thousands of dollars." Iskir
accused Acikalin of "freezing the Endowment Fund, the earned
interest of which provides the operating expenses of the ATAA."
He said that "over $95,000 is due the ATAA for more than six
months."
Iskir also said that the lawsuit is "a major diversion from
our goals and mission at a critical time. Turkish Americans have
been under intense attack by certain ethnic groups. Two
anti-Turkish pro-Armenian resolutions are pending on Capitol
Hill with a new Congress determined to legislate these
claims=80¦. The ATAA required unity right now. This lawsuit
threatens that unity." This statement is an obvious attempt by
the ATAA to use the Armenian genocide resolution as a rallying
cry to unite a hopelessly divided organization.
Iskir stated that the lawsuit made the ATAA vulnerable for
potential exploitation by its opponents, probably meaning the
Armenians. He wrote: "Worse than the salacious e-mail traffic
and defamatory public statements of some of the plaintiffs and
their handful of supporters, the filing of this lawsuit makes
available to any curious eyes the ATAA's inner workings and
conflicts. Not just the complaint, but also all evidence
presented in the future, including e-mails, depositions,
financial disclosures, meeting notes, etc., will be part of the
public record for all to see. Our traditional antagonists will
start gloating about the ATAA's poor financial condition, or our
factionalism, or our unfortunate preoccupations with this court
action to the detriment of our programs. When those who wish
ill toward Turkish-Americans use the evidence in this lawsuit as
a roadmap of how to exploit our weaknesses, will the plaintiffs
step up and explain, or will they deflect responsibility for
their personal actions upon others and the ATAA?"
While it is not surprising that there are divisions among
Turkish-Americans, what is truly incredible is that the conflict
is so acrimonious that even the Ambassador of Turkey and Turkish
governmental leaders, who count heavily on ATAA's grassroots
support for lobbying purposes in Washington, must have failed to
dissuade the feuding parties, particularly since the plaintiffs
and the defendants are board members of the same organization.
Rather than "gloating," this writer's intent is simply to
point out that Armenians are sometimes too harsh on themselves.
They wrongly believe that they are more disunited than others.
Jews, Arabs, Turks, Koreans, Russians, and all other ethnic
groups are just as divided as Armenians. Of course, unity is an
admirable objective and the more a community is united, the more
successfully it can pursue its collective interests and
aspirations.