LAWYER STATES THAT CASE ON ATTEMPTED MURDER AGAINST RA
DEPUTY MELIK GASPARIAN EXAMINED WITH GROSS VIOLATIONS
27-11-2007 19:15:00 | Armenia | Social
YEREVAN, NOVEMBER 27, NOYAN TAPAN. The preliminary
examination and judicial enquiry on case with accusation of
making an attempted murder through blowing up RA MP Melik
Gasparian's car proceeded with gross violations. Karen
Mezhlumian, the lawyer of Silva Asatrian, the defendant on the
case, stated at the November 27 press conference. On October 12,
2007, a sentence was passed on the case by the court of
Yerevan's Avan and Nor Nork communities. At present the case is
being examined at the Criminal Appeal Court, presided over by
judge Samvel Uzunian.
Among "gross violations of law," the lawyer mentioned the
incident when as early as in the process of preliminary
examination, Silva Asatrian, the defendant on the case, was
"kidnapped," as it was cleared up lately, was taken to the
Yerevan-Kentron penitentiary office of the National Security
Service, was illegally arrested, though Pargev Ohanian, a judge
at Yerevan Kentron and Nork-Marash communities' first instance
court, had dismissed the petition of arrest. This was followed
by a joint statement of S. Asatrian's lawyers and human rights
activists, addressed to RA Prosecutor General Aghvan Hovsepian,
on instituting a criminal case on the fact.
"No decision on instituting a criminal case or dismissing
its institution was made by the RA Prosecutor General's Office
on that written report, the statement was only attached to the
case and was sent to the court," the lawyer said.
Among violations of law, the defence party also mentioned
the fact that Silva Asatrian was prohibited to interrogate Yuri
Wolfson, who had testified against her, which is a violation of
the provisions the European Convention of Human Rights. This
violation was aggravated for even more by the circumstance that
Wolfson had stated at the court that the testimony was extorted
from him as a result of tortures, at the bidding of the
preliminary examination body.
Among violations of law, the lawyer also mentioned the fact
that the sentence was provided to them only ten days after it
had been pronounced, though the law establishes a five-day term.
The protocols of court sittings were also provided to the party
with a delay.