VERDICT ON ANM'S LAWSUIT AGAINST SHANT TV COMPANY TO BE
PRONOUNCED IN 2008
24-12-2007 18:45:00 | Armenia | Social
YEREVAN, DECEMBER 24, NOYAN TAPAN. The judicial enquiry on
the case of lawsuit of the Armenian National Movement (ANM)
Party against the Shant TV company, presided over by judge Saro
Aramian, finished on December 24 at the first instance court of
Arabkir and Kanaker-Zeytun communities of Yerevan. ANM
representative Karen Karapetian affirmed the lawsuit, with which
the latter asks to oblige the TV company to refute the
information discrediting party's good reputation. According to
the shorthand report introduced to the court, during the October
30 information program of Shant, announcer Nver Mnatsakanian
said that an anonymous call was received by the TV company, the
author of which threatened that if they give some negative
information on first President Levon Ter-Petrosian, he will
explode the journalists and their relatives. After that N.
Mnatsakanian mentioned "by the way" that the TV company has
invited one of ANM Board members to its information program, but
the latter did not agree to come. Then the announcer condemned
the phenomenon with the words "no matter what political force
has done it." "What grounds do you have that this is a political
force and not a maniac?" the ANM representative asked. It was
also emphasized that the phone number, from which they called
the TV company, is known. And on November 1 the Pakagits
newspaper distorted the statements made on air for even more, by
publishing that material under the title "ANM Threatens."
A representative of the respondent party, lawyer Aram
Karakhanian said that the information voiced by Shant does not
contain any element discrediting party's good reputation, honor
and dignity. He noted that the law demands refuting the
information and not the analysis or opinion made on the basis of
it.
Eduard Chinarian, a representative of the Pakagits
newspaper, stated that the title "is not information," that the
statement made by Shant was not distorted in the newspaper's
material.
The verdict on the case will be pronounced on January 9.